Here’s a short excerpt from the seminal book of Brazilian scientist, Dr. Norberto Keppe. In this fascinating work, psychoanalyst and philosopher, Norberto Keppe, shows us how the inverted concepts in science especially Einsteins are causing us to desperately try to get energy from material, and destroying our planet and ourselves in the process.

I dedicate this book to the physicists, biologists (geneticists) and metaphysical researchers clamoring for help because the researchers in the so-called social sciences have shown a certain difficulty in understanding my work—precisely because it is largely based on Physics, the “King” of all sciences. It is for this reason that I strongly believe that those who love Physics are most easily able to understand my work. Yet, Physics in its postulates has followed Aristotelian metaphysics almost without variation. This would be fine if only these postulates were correct. But, the Stagirite’s philosophical reasoning was inverted and then passed on to modern science, which is why I wrote this book trying to correct what I could. I have the impression that few scientists realize that they are strongly influenced by a philosophical system.

All my work is being considered from the point of view of a union of science (starting with psychopathology) with philosophy and theology, and this is providing the means to correct the fundamental mistakes made in all three sectors. In this, I am also respecting the dogmas of theology, which are above but not against reason. I am not saying that experimentation in itself is wrong but that it has followed an incorrect orientation, which is a process that practically doesn’t exist. The enormous value of science lies in its ability to confirm if what we think is correct or not.

In ancient times, human society accepted philosophy perfectly, as long as it addressed the areas of ideas and “theology.” But the arrival of the Middle Ages saw the religious groups restricting themselves more to dogma, and this created a number of conflicts with the other groups in society.

The double helix reveals how the vital principle is triune; that is, the connection between essential (scalar) energy and chemistry taking the form of a helix: “The core of the helix is occupied by the purine and pyrimidine bases—the phosphate groups are on the outside…The pairing of the purine with pyrimidine is very exact, and dictated by their desire to form hydrogen bonds—adenine will pair with thymine while guanine will always pair with cytosine” (“The Double Helix,” James D. Watson, Letter from Jim to Max). The problem arises when the scientist thinks that life comes from matter and not from a dual energetic element, which in turn creates a chemical reaction. This is why modifying the genetic code cannot be positive, since any alteration in the chemistry of the gene will generate a distortion, because energy can never be modified at the fundamental level.

He’s widely considered one of the greatest scientific geniuses of all time. A humble civil servant, he rose from obscurity to change the world of science – and altered how we see the world. He was known and famous for his Theory of Relativity. Only one problem – Einstein’s scientific theory was fundamentally flawed. Listen in as we correct Einstein’s mistake.

Play or Download

It was Aristotle who led the compartmentalization of science into all its disciplines. He oriented us away from Plato’s more universal perspective to looking down to the senses for understanding reality. It was a significant mistake, and in case you’ve never given any thought to how philosophy drives science, strap yourself in. Today on Thinking with Somebody Else’s Head, The Revolution in Science, prompted by the discoveries of Brazilian/Austrian psychoanalyst and social scientist, Norberto Keppe.

Play or Download

Mandela wrote that true freedom is not just merely casting off your own chains, but living in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others.

I love that last part because it implies that we have an obligation to do something to assist the general welfare – not just sit back in our “I’m all right, Jack” armchairs.

But it strikes me as I think about it that, actually, the strongest prisons that hold us hostage are not those made of concrete and steel and barbed wire. We live in prisons erected by our wrong beliefs and philosophies of life.

Norberto Keppe has written voluminously about a psycho-social condition called Inversion and how this has caused us to see reality upside down. A deep reading of his vast output will take you on a journey of human consciousness that will mark a turning point in your life. You will never be the same after his great discoveries of human psychology enter your consciousness.

One of the inverted institutions that locks us into an inferior perspective is modern science. Our lauded scientific worldview is seriously incomplete.

The Keppe Motor and the Disinversion of Science, today on Thinking with Somebody Else’s Head.

Click here to listen to this episode.

Our program today will be the first of two parts exploring how the inferior sensory-based science got so entrenched in our academic institutions – and our society in general. It’s the result of a great lie perpetrated and followed by many great thinkers who were fooled into following the lie.

Play or Download

Last time on our program, Cesar Soós and I began our discussion about the mistakes of the leading thinkers in our human civilization have led us to the mess our modern society finds itself in today. On our last program, we discussed the crucial errors of Freud and Darwin. Who are the other fathers of the lie who have led us totally in the wrong direction?

Play or Download

Oil and water. Cats and sweaters. Neckties and table fans. Some things just aren’t made to go together. Some more profound examples could include faith and doubt, humility and self-confidence. And what about God and science? How could they ever go together? Norberto Keppe’s science is about bringing them together. Finally.

Play or Download

In the 1500s, the scientific revolution was in full bloom. Scientists were fighting for independence from the theological dogmas that were unchallengeable. The Bible was literally interpreted back then, so when it said the sun rises and sets, that was the final word.

One of the lead revolutionaries – the scientific Che Guevara, if you will – was Galileo, who proposed that actually it was the Earth that was moving, not the sun. This caused quite the furor back in the 1630s.

Today, there is another scientific revolution emerging. There are no Inquisition trials, but Norberto Keppe‘s scientific perspective is receiving the modern day equivalent – silence from the scientific mainstream. His views, though, are still shaking the foundations of science just as Galileo and Bacon did 600 years ago.

Keppe doesn’t make the mistake the 16th century scientific radicals did, however, of throwing out philosophy and theology from his scientific proposals. It makes for a comprehensive science that’s poised to lead us to a new society.

Click here to listen to this episode.

In The Brothers Karamazov, Dostoyevsky writes, “You have needs, satisfy them. Don’t hesitate. Expand your needs and demand more.” He calls this “the worldly doctrine of today.”

But true to the depth of the great writer, he acknowledges the trap we fall into when we pursue a life of singular materialism.

“The result,” Dostoevsky writes, “For the rich is isolation and suicide, for the poor, envy and murder.”

So boiling that down to its metaphysical essence, Dostoevsky was basically suggesting that the popular bumper sticker, “He who dies with the most toys wins,” is a lot of twaddle.

But materialism is our inheritance from about 500 years of science bent on eradicating anything to do with spirituality – which they termed superstitious – from their theories.

I don’t think this was a step up. In the end, a materialistic philosophy narrows our perspective to where mere survival becomes our primary objective.

Transcending Einstein and Materialism with Keppe’s New Physics, today on Thinking with Somebody Else’s Head.

Click here to listen to this episode.

Any critique of modern science hits up against a formidable wall of skepticism and blind loyalty to the dogma that characterizes the scientific world view today.

That won’t stop us from attempting the task, however.

Because something changed in science. Although scientists today are generally against any idea of a transcendental reality, it wasn’t always like that. For centuries, the greatest geniuses considered the ultimate creative force of God fundamental to understanding of anything.

And then, it all changed. Let’s explore that change, and show how modern scientific dogma has led us to a blind alley that we won’t be able to escape from without reuniting science with theology and philosophy – which is exactly what Norberto Keppe’s Analytical Trilogy does.

Within this critique will also be some fundamental knowledge about the human psyche and its contribution to our problems, and the hopeful possibilities emerging from the Keppe Motor.

Click here to listen to this episode.

Oil and water. Cats and sweaters. Neckties and table fans. Some things just aren’t made to go together. Like being given plastic cutlery at a Brazilian barbecue restaurant, they’re incongruous and difficult to reconcile. Some more profound examples could include faith and doubt, humility and self-confidence. And what about God and science?

Today on Thinking with Somebody Else’s Head, the Marriage of Theology and Science.

This is a prickly subject. I’m aware of that. But I feel I would be doing a dis-service to you who listen faithfully to this program if I didn’t address the subject. Because there are fundamental questions to raise that can only be addressed if we wade into these uncertain waters.

What is the origin of life and the universe? What is the purpose of life? These are the questions that perhaps should occupy our dinner conversations with dear friends much more than they do. Especially in recent years. And in large part, I think this is because science has split from theology and philosophy over the past 500 years or so – culminating in our 20th Century position that there’s no way to marry science and theology. Science has become a strictly materialistic pursuit perfectly represented in Einstein’s famous formula – the most famous of the 20th Century – that E=mc2. No material, no energy is the inevitable conclusion of this equation, making Einstein’s proposal one of the most materialistic theories in the history of science.

And it’s also difficult to distill spirituality from the Quantum Physics camp. Parallel realities. Alternate universes. Unlimited realities awaiting your choice to come into being. How to make sense of that in any practical way? I watched What the Bleep do we Know a couple of times and, I must confess, couldn’t make head or tails of it.

The Architect’s speech from Matrix Reloaded is a classic example of how confused we’ve become by this separation of science and theology. Critics call it “profound” but “confusing”. And it is that. Listen:

“The first matrix was perfect … flawless, sublime. A triumph equaled only by its monumental failure.”

What does that mean? No, we need a better starting point than this. A starting place that can be found in the work of Norberto Keppe. His Analytical Trilogy is a re-synthesis of science with philosophy and theology that has been missing. Keppe considers philosophy to be the mother of science and theology the grandmother, and it’s very illuminating to look at reality through Analytical Trilogy eyes.

Click here to listen to this episode.